We were too lazy to report on the World of Warcraft (WoW) miniatures game slated for release on November 11th when we heard about it many months ago, but Massively’s recent post on the release reminded us of the irony.
Warcraft has taken the opposite approach of its initial inspiration, Warhammer, by starting with video games and later moving on to miniature-based board games!
Massively’s reporting leaves something to be desired, as Warcraft is only partially based on Warhammer, and Warhammer isn’t a board game, it’s a tabletop wargame, as it doesn’t rely on the use of a board and pre-packaged elements at all, as armies are constructed from different packages. Nonetheless, Massively makes its point, in that WoW’s success prompted Blizzard to try their hand at miniature wargaming. This isn’t the same as Games Workshop bringing their Warhammer license to the MMOG space, however, because WoW’s miniature game won’t likely compete with Warhammer at all, since WoW’s miniature game is collectible.
Like Mage Knight before it, the WoW miniature game is based on purchasing a starter pack, and then booster packs to acquire new units for one’s army. The downside for buyers is that the boosters contain units that the buyer can’t see until they open the box, which makes collectible miniature games into the same type of enormous money-sink that collectible card games (CCGs) are. Warhammer, on the other hand, is not collectible in the same sense, as players directly buy the units they want to field in an army.
There are also other differences: Warhammer’s sculptures are of a higher quality than those of most (if not all) collectible miniature games, and most units do not come assembled, and are unpainted when purchased. This means that players spend considerable preparation time before having an army ready to field, but for most wargamers, that’s half the fun.
From what we can tell, the WoW miniatures game is designed to field very small armies (~5 units), whereas games like Warhammer excel at fielding many more, for a much more epic battle experience. So, rather than take Warhammer head-on, Blizzard is pushing the WoW miniatures game at much more casual wargamers who are new to the hobby, else haven’t yet jumped in. For veteran wargamers, the WoW miniatures game will likely be little more than a novelty for fans of WoW, and ignored otherwise.
We’d be surprised if the WoW miniatures game even comes close to reaching the success Mage Knight did in its peak, and as we know, Mage Knight didn’t last long even after a product refresh (which arguably did more harm than good). If Blizzard’s entry into this space is an honest one, we’ll still be surprised if the game ends up with more than two or three expansions on top of its limited unit pool at release.
Similar Posts:
- World of Warcraft miniatures game: blech! – Okay, so we haven’t played it yet so can’t comment on the actual gameplay, but we recently saw some…
- The lessons of a deceased Mage Knight. – We don’t do many post-mortem posts at mendax.org, but perhaps we should start. We say that because t…
- Arcane Legions: great idea, questionable execution. – Arcane Legions appears to be an interesting project by some of the former minds behind FASA and WizK…
{ 2 comments }
It’s obvious, both the Massivley’s post and this one, are about as ignorant as possible. I play both wow minis and warhammer and I fail to find anything substanstial in your claims. Stating WoW had Warhammer for an inpsiration for their minis game is like saying asain music was inspired by western classical music. Two TOTALLY diffrent games in every aspect. Seriously, both reporters did not even play the frikin game. Now, back to this shamble of an article. Partially based on warhammer? Like how? Let’s not mention the comment on mage knight…successful game? I think not since mageknight is the most horrid cmg I have played alongside heroclix, sw, and dnd minis. WoW minis actually stepped it up by making a new cmg (with a much better improvement on clix mechanics)that successfully translated the feel of the online game characters and their corresponding abilities. It also gave a bit of the wow tcg “flavor” to it as well. Too bad the license got entrusted with the upper deck buffoons and hence the prediction made in this article not getting past a third expansion was correct…just not for the reason given. I don’t get why warhammer fanboys have to crap all over anything miniature without having even played other games. Warhammer is a great game and I have enjoyed for more than a decade now but it’s unfortunate to find alot of fanboys so shallow and limited in their experience when it come to other cmgs. Shallow, very shallow. privateer press on the other hand smokes GW by a long shot if you really want to compare similar games. End of line…
To deny Warmhammer’s influence on WoW is akin to denything that Tolkien had any influence on the fantasy genre at large.
Regarding Mage Knight’s success vs the WoW miniature game, let’s consider this: Mage Knight saw 16 expansions over its five-year life-cycle, and its rules were adopted for HeroClix, the most financially successful collectible miniatures game in history.
The WoW miniature game, on the other hand, saw three expansions over its one-year life-cycle.
Maybe you, and others, liked the WoW miniatures rules better than any of the Clix rules, but that means nothing as far as the market penetration and financial success of Mage Knight goes. Simply put, many more people enjoyed Mage Knight, so you are in the minority.
{ 2 trackbacks }