<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: mendax.org -&gt; wyldkard.com.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beastwith.in/2009/03/13/mendaxorg-wyldkardcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beastwith.in/2009/03/13/mendaxorg-wyldkardcom/</link>
	<description>A mental brouhaha, est. 1996.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:07:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WyldKard</title>
		<link>http://beastwith.in/2009/03/13/mendaxorg-wyldkardcom/comment-page-1/#comment-611</link>
		<dc:creator>WyldKard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wyldkard.com/?p=1570#comment-611</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the feedback. Regarding the commenting, you&#039;re saying that you&#039;d like a &quot;leave comment&quot; form at the bottom of the top post on the front page? The way it&#039;s handled now is the same way commenting is handled on most blogs - you have to click the &quot;comment&quot; link to get to the post&#039;s individual page.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The benefit with this method is that a reader can review existing comments before leaving their own, whereas cropping existing comments from the front page, but still leaving a commenting form, defeats this.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And no, we&#039;re sticking with the old pronoun for now. It&#039;s &lt;i&gt;stylistic&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback. Regarding the commenting, you&#8217;re saying that you&#8217;d like a &#8220;leave comment&#8221; form at the bottom of the top post on the front page? The way it&#8217;s handled now is the same way commenting is handled on most blogs &#8211; you have to click the &#8220;comment&#8221; link to get to the post&#8217;s individual page.</p>

<p>The benefit with this method is that a reader can review existing comments before leaving their own, whereas cropping existing comments from the front page, but still leaving a commenting form, defeats this.</p>

<p>And no, we&#8217;re sticking with the old pronoun for now. It&#8217;s <i>stylistic</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aelel</title>
		<link>http://beastwith.in/2009/03/13/mendaxorg-wyldkardcom/comment-page-1/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>Aelel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wyldkard.com/?p=1570#comment-610</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The new site is much cleaner looking than the old site, which is nice.  I especially like the little spinning globe of topics.  Double nice.  I really wish, however, since you&#039;re retooling a bit, that you&#039;d make it easier to leave comments.  I don&#039;t like having to constantly click on an article to get to a place where I can leave a comment.  It&#039;s an unnecessary step, especially on the feature article.  I can understand it if you&#039;re reading an abstract of the article, since you have to click to read the rest of it anyway.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Does this mean that you&#039;re going to stop using the pronoun &quot;we&quot; when referring to yourself, because that would be jawesome.  :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new site is much cleaner looking than the old site, which is nice.  I especially like the little spinning globe of topics.  Double nice.  I really wish, however, since you&#8217;re retooling a bit, that you&#8217;d make it easier to leave comments.  I don&#8217;t like having to constantly click on an article to get to a place where I can leave a comment.  It&#8217;s an unnecessary step, especially on the feature article.  I can understand it if you&#8217;re reading an abstract of the article, since you have to click to read the rest of it anyway.</p>

<p>Does this mean that you&#8217;re going to stop using the pronoun &#8220;we&#8221; when referring to yourself, because that would be jawesome.  <img src='http://beastwith.in/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

